Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

values.com

Welcome | The Foundation for a Better Life

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

157 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

values.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Values content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about values.com

Welcome to the website of the Foundation for a Better Life. The values we live by are worth more when we #PassItOn.

Visit values.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Values.com page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

values.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

values.com

157 ms

values.com

314 ms

www.values.com

337 ms

www.passiton.com

511 ms

bootstrap.min.css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Values.com, 53% (56 requests) were made to Passiton.com and 14% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Passiton.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 979.5 kB (23%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Values.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 74.7 kB

  • Original 90.3 kB
  • After minification 84.5 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 691 B

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Values images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 329.4 kB

  • Original 668.1 kB
  • After minification 668.1 kB
  • After compression 338.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 329.4 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 574.8 kB

  • Original 685.1 kB
  • After minification 681.4 kB
  • After compression 110.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Values.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 574.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (23%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

64

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Values. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

values.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

values.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

values.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Values.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Values.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Values. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: