Access nonsolostelle.com. Comprare e Regalare una stella doppia o singola

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.9 s

5/100

10%

nonsolostelle.com

346 ms

www.nonsolostelle.com

1630 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

339 ms

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

datetimepicker.css

453 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Nonsolostelle.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Nonsolostelle.com.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

309.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Nonsolostelle.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 964.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 58.0 kB

Original 71.1 kB
After minification 70.2 kB
After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

Original 57.7 kB
After minification 34.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nonsolostelle needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 762.8 kB

Original 964.8 kB
After minification 670.6 kB
After compression 202.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 762.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 269.8 kB

Original 329.4 kB
After minification 300.5 kB
After compression 59.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nonsolostelle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 269.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nonsolostelle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.