Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

nteg.net

Home

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

905 ms

Page Rendered

265 ms

About Website

Welcome to nteg.net homepage info - get ready to check Nteg best content right away, or after learning these important things about nteg.net

Integrity Network Solutions Inc. Staying Connected Since 2003 Integrity offers managed services along with a host of IT, network, and cybersecurity solutions. Our approach to your environment ensures ...

Visit nteg.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Nteg.net page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nteg.net performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nteg.net

56 ms

nteg.net

29 ms

419 ms

jquery.min.js

53 ms

174 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Nteg.net, 54% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (419 ms) belongs to the original domain Nteg.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (69%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

536.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Nteg.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 914.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 998.0 kB
  • After compression 87.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 914.5 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 94.7 kB
  • After minification 84.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nteg needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 273.8 kB

  • Original 638.3 kB
  • After minification 638.3 kB
  • After compression 364.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 273.8 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (64%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nteg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nteg.net accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

[lang] attributes do not have a valid value

Best Practices

nteg.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

nteg.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nteg.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nteg.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nteg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: