Access potterslawn.com. Irrigation Companies Boca Raton, FL

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,510 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

potterslawn.com

53 ms

www.potterslawn.com

205 ms

hic.js

23 ms

potters-lawn-and-landscaping-logo-530w.png

174 ms

potters-lawn-and-landscaping-hero-home-8840256d-1920w.jpg

320 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Potterslawn.com, 18% (4 requests) were made to Le-cdn.hibuwebsites.com and 18% (4 requests) were made to Static-res-cdn.websites.hibu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (320 ms) relates to the external source Le-cdn.hibuwebsites.com.

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

440.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Potterslawn.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 710.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 506.5 kB

Original 710.5 kB
After minification 692.6 kB
After compression 204.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 506.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

Original 60.0 kB
After minification 50.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Potterslawn needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 61.0 kB

Original 247.4 kB
After minification 238.0 kB
After compression 186.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 60 B

Original 311 B
After minification 311 B
After compression 251 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Potterslawn.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60 B or 19% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Potterslawn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.