Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

praktijkmossink.nl

Behandeling chronische ziekte van Lyme - | LymeCenter.nl

Page Load Speed

10.8 sec in total

First Response

2.4 sec

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

164 ms

About Website

Visit praktijkmossink.nl now to see the best up-to-date Praktijkmossink content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about praktijkmossink.nl

Chronische ziekte van Lyme lastig te behandelen? Antibioticakuur onsuccesvol. Is er dan geen andere behandeling mogelijk? Zeker wel: bezoek LymeCenter.

Visit praktijkmossink.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Praktijkmossink.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

praktijkmossink.nl performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lymecenter.nl

2442 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

95 ms

style.css

191 ms

flaticon.css

281 ms

style.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Praktijkmossink.nl, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Lymecenter.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

751.3 kB

After Optimization

675.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Praktijkmossink.nl main page is 751.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 261.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

  • Original 49.3 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 261.0 kB
  • After minification 256.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Praktijkmossink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 224.0 kB
  • After minification 224.0 kB
  • After compression 213.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

  • Original 217.0 kB
  • After minification 214.8 kB
  • After compression 196.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Praktijkmossink.nl has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (86%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Praktijkmossink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 46 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

praktijkmossink.nl accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

praktijkmossink.nl best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

praktijkmossink.nl SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Praktijkmossink.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Praktijkmossink.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Praktijkmossink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: