Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

prolite.in

Emergency Light | Fire Signages | Emergency egress | Site Safety

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

353 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

203 ms

About Website

Welcome to prolite.in homepage info - get ready to check Prolite best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about prolite.in

Prolite Manufactures Emergency Light,Fire Signages,Exit Light,Fire Signages,Signages and are first Exit and Emergency Egress Route Lighting Systems manufacturer

Visit prolite.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Prolite.in page load time and found that the first response time was 353 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

prolite.in performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.526

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

prolite.in

353 ms

main.css

280 ms

jquery-1.9.1.js

744 ms

jquery.easing.js

192 ms

main.js

194 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Prolite.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Prolite.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 280.8 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Prolite.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Prolite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 249.4 kB

  • Original 293.1 kB
  • After minification 155.6 kB
  • After compression 43.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 25.1 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Prolite.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Prolite. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

prolite.in accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

prolite.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

prolite.in SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Prolite.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Prolite.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Prolite. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: