Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

protectivepackaging.net

Protective Packaging Corporation | Mil Spec Flexible Packaging Solutions

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

194 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

4.7 sec

About Website

Visit protectivepackaging.net now to see the best up-to-date Protective Packaging content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about protectivepackaging.net

Protective Packaging is the premiere mil spec flexible packaging converter in the south: moisture barrier bags, static shielding bags, heat sealers & more.

Visit protectivepackaging.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Protectivepackaging.net page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

protectivepackaging.net performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.165

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

protectivepackaging.net

194 ms

www.protectivepackaging.net

133 ms

www.protectivepackaging.net

903 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

299 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

321 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Protectivepackaging.net, 95% (107 requests) were made to 1bd2w23p0h3e9efi2o2oiwuf-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (903 ms) belongs to the original domain Protectivepackaging.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (24%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

4.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Protectivepackaging.net main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB
  • After compression 230.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 4.4 MB
  • After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Protective Packaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 40.9 kB

  • Original 166.7 kB
  • After minification 166.7 kB
  • After compression 125.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.9 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (79%)

Requests Now

107

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Protective Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 86 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

protectivepackaging.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

protectivepackaging.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

protectivepackaging.net SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Protectivepackaging.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Protectivepackaging.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Protective Packaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: