Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

qlinepackaging.com

Buy Online Printed Plastic Courier Bags | Tamper Proof Courier Bags

Page Load Speed

10.8 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

976 ms

About Website

Visit qlinepackaging.com now to see the best up-to-date Qlinepackaging content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qlinepackaging.com

Shop For Printed Courier Bags And Plastic Courier Bags At Qline. Get Huge Discount On Tamper Proof Courier Bags And Tamper Proof Bags At Qlinepackaging.

Visit qlinepackaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qlinepackaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qlinepackaging.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.062

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qlinepackaging.com

1743 ms

local-sync-public.css

457 ms

style.min.css

681 ms

theme.min.css

688 ms

header-footer.min.css

687 ms

Our browser made a total of 129 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Qlinepackaging.com, 13% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Ummdigital.tech. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Qlinepackaging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (26%)

Content Size

9.2 MB

After Optimization

6.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qlinepackaging.com main page is 9.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 169.3 kB

  • Original 196.9 kB
  • After minification 187.2 kB
  • After compression 27.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 169.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 8.7 MB
  • After minification 6.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qlinepackaging needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 87.5 kB

  • Original 215.2 kB
  • After minification 214.8 kB
  • After compression 127.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.5 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 77.5 kB
  • After minification 77.4 kB
  • After compression 76.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qlinepackaging.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (41%)

Requests Now

103

After Optimization

61

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qlinepackaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

qlinepackaging.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

qlinepackaging.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

qlinepackaging.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qlinepackaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qlinepackaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qlinepackaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: