Access radesign.co.nz. REBECCA ANN DESIGN | GRAPHIC DESIGN AND BRANDING STUDIO

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,780 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

www.radesign.co.nz

119 ms

slide-normalize-f3e05d707a08546a77c65-min.en-US.css

25 ms

ECSeuGzASC5ir1sxtv4hAxtbWbXgWHtJyR9H_Mir50vfeGIIf4e6pUJ6wRMU5QwXFmvuFe9tw2btFc9XjRgKjD485AIowD9DZ2q-q3w7OcBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlOfG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80Zko0ZWbCHKoySkolZP37O148jcmRjhIlZ14yShmkOWgEwcj0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOfG0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8ifUySkolZPUCdhFydeyzSabCScBqZWFTZht0jhv0d1GCScmKZAFRjPucScBDZWJlSYGkZKoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCSaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCiaiaOcBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOYiaikoySkolZPUaiaS0ScBqZWFTZht0jhv0d1GCiaiaO148jcmRjhIlZ14yShmkOWgEwcj0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaikoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlJygcScmTZhyXOWFyd1wlSY4zJ68ciWsuScIlSYb7fbKP-sMMeM96MKG4fJZmIMIjMkMfH6qJxubbMs6BJMHbMiK4rTCe.js

444 ms

legacy.js

16 ms

modern.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Radesign.co.nz, 57% (12 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com and 19% (4 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (444 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Radesign.co.nz main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 313.6 kB

Original 342.9 kB
After minification 342.7 kB
After compression 29.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 313.6 kB or 91% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 454.8 kB

Original 1.7 MB
After minification 1.7 MB
After compression 1.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 454.8 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 55 B

Original 6.5 kB
After minification 6.5 kB
After compression 6.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radesign.co.nz has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ra DESIGN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.