Tools & Wizards About Us
qualityforum.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

qualityforum.org

NQF: Home

Page Load Speed

610 ms in total

First Response

106 ms

Resources Loaded

381 ms

Page Rendered

123 ms

qualityforum.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Qualityforum content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about qualityforum.org

Consensus drives every aspect of NQF work. Expert committee members represent diverse interests from every healthcare sector. Measures are endorsed by NQF only after thoughtful discussion and debate f...

Visit qualityforum.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Qualityforum.org page load time and found that the first response time was 106 ms and then it took 504 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Qualityforum.org rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

qualityforum.org performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qualityforum.org

106 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

61 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

21 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

37 ms

NQF_Logo.png

152 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Qualityforum.org, 20% (1 request) were made to Jointcommission.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (152 ms) relates to the external source Jointcommission.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 381 B (0%)

Content Size

122.5 kB

After Optimization

122.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Qualityforum.org main page is 122.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 101.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 361 B

  • Original 883 B
  • After minification 883 B
  • After compression 522 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 361 B or 41% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 101.2 kB
  • After minification 101.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qualityforum images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 20 B

  • Original 20.4 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 20.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qualityforum. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

qualityforum.org

qualityforum.org

106 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

61 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

21 ms

_Incapsula_Resource

_Incapsula_Resource

37 ms

NQF_Logo.png

NQF_Logo.png

152 ms

Accessibility Review

qualityforum.org accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

qualityforum.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

qualityforum.org SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualityforum.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Qualityforum.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

qualityforum.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qualityforum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: