Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

resultant.com

Data and Technology Consulting Services | Resultant

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

436 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Resultant content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about resultant.com

Resultant is a modern consulting firm, focused on technology, data analytics, and digital transformation, with a passion for problem-solving.

Visit resultant.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Resultant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

resultant.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,420 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

resultant.com

136 ms

resultant.com

207 ms

picturefill.min.js

19 ms

main-5040438a72.min.css

44 ms

outdatedbrowser.min.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Resultant.com, 10% (11 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (591 ms) belongs to the original domain Resultant.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 173.5 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Resultant.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 163.7 kB

  • Original 190.8 kB
  • After minification 161.6 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.2 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 163.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Resultant images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 239.8 kB
  • After minification 239.8 kB
  • After compression 232.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 84.0 kB
  • After minification 84.0 kB
  • After compression 81.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Resultant.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (60%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Resultant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

resultant.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

resultant.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

resultant.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Resultant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Resultant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Resultant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: