Access ribblr.com. Ribblr - a world of crafting, right from your pocket

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value29,930 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value47.1 s

0/100

10%

ribblr.com

601 ms

footer_and_header.css

26 ms

jquery.min.js

31 ms

lightslider.js

41 ms

jssocials.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 186 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Ribblr.com, 31% (58 requests) were made to Storage.googleapis.com and 17% (31 requests) were made to Static.cdninstagram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) belongs to the original domain Ribblr.com.

Content Size

6.8 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Ribblr.com main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 189.3 kB

Original 237.5 kB
After minification 222.8 kB
After compression 48.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 89.9 kB

Original 876.8 kB
After minification 787.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ribblr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 3.9 MB

Original 5.7 MB
After minification 5.7 MB
After compression 1.7 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.9 MB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

Original 53.3 kB
After minification 53.3 kB
After compression 39.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ribblr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Now

129

After Optimization

The browser has sent 129 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ribblr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.