Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rittenbergsamuel.com

Rittenberg, Samuel & Phillips, LLC - Larry Samuel, M.H. Phillips

Page Load Speed

688 ms in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

270 ms

Page Rendered

356 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rittenberg Samuel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rittenbergsamuel.com

New Orleans attorneys prepare and probate wills, handle successions, Education Law and School Law larry samuel

Visit rittenbergsamuel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rittenbergsamuel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 626 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rittenbergsamuel.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rittenbergsamuel.com

62 ms

script.js

92 ms

UX.4.33.5.js

50 ms

script.js

126 ms

scc-c2.min.js

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rittenbergsamuel.com, 80% (4 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (126 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 414.0 kB (72%)

Content Size

571.7 kB

After Optimization

157.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rittenbergsamuel.com main page is 571.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 445.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 107.1 kB

  • Original 126.3 kB
  • After minification 126.3 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 306.9 kB

  • Original 445.4 kB
  • After minification 445.4 kB
  • After compression 138.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 306.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (75%)

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rittenberg Samuel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

rittenbergsamuel.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rittenbergsamuel.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rittenbergsamuel.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rittenbergsamuel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rittenbergsamuel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rittenberg Samuel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: