Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

rjsjanitorial.com

Commercial, Warehouse & Medical Cleaning Services

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

25 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

953 ms

About Website

Visit rjsjanitorial.com now to see the best up-to-date Rjsjanitorial content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rjsjanitorial.com

At Clean Team we take great pride in our work, and strive to meet and exceed our clients' expectations. We tailor our janitorial cleaning services to meet the needs of any office, educational faci...

Visit rjsjanitorial.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rjsjanitorial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rjsjanitorial.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,340 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.369

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rjsjanitorial.com

25 ms

www.cleanteamclean.com

69 ms

www.cleanteamclean.com

137 ms

base

221 ms

page

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rjsjanitorial.com, 63% (36 requests) were made to Static.spacecrafted.com and 19% (11 requests) were made to Cleanteamclean.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (549 ms) relates to the external source Static.spacecrafted.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 363.7 kB (4%)

Content Size

8.6 MB

After Optimization

8.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Rjsjanitorial.com main page is 8.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 70.2 kB

  • Original 104.9 kB
  • After minification 100.2 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 293.5 kB

  • Original 8.5 MB
  • After minification 8.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rjsjanitorial images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (20%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

39

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rjsjanitorial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

rjsjanitorial.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

rjsjanitorial.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rjsjanitorial.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rjsjanitorial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rjsjanitorial.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rjsjanitorial. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: