Access rockpooldigital.com. We're a leading digital agency based in Bristol

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.09

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

rockpooldigital.com

348 ms

www.rockpooldigital.com

513 ms

styles.css

90 ms

fej8pid.css

96 ms

polyfills.bundle.js

270 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Rockpooldigital.com, 21% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 7% (1 request) were made to P.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (513 ms) belongs to the original domain Rockpooldigital.com.

Content Size

350.8 kB

After Optimization

303.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Rockpooldigital.com main page is 350.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 223.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 15.0 kB

Original 22.1 kB
After minification 22.1 kB
After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

Original 223.8 kB
After minification 213.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rockpool Digital images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

Original 96.1 kB
After minification 96.1 kB
After compression 76.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.8 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

Original 8.8 kB
After minification 8.8 kB
After compression 6.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockpooldigital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rockpool Digital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.