6.9 sec in total
1.4 sec
5.1 sec
364 ms
Visit seorl.net now to see the best up-to-date SEORL content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about seorl.net
Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello
Visit seorl.netWe analyzed Seorl.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
seorl.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value5,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.231
54/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
1394 ms
373 ms
1202 ms
270 ms
271 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Seorl.net, 12% (14 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Seorl.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (62%)
4.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Seorl.net main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 698.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, SEORL needs image optimization as it can save up to 698.6 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 435.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seorl.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 435.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (66%)
108
37
The browser has sent 108 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SEORL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
seorl.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
seorl.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
seorl.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Seorl.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Seorl.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
seorl.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SEORL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: