Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

shattuc.com

Bulk A/V Cable, Wire, and Fiber Optic Manufacturer - Shattuc

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

588 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

310 ms

About Website

Visit shattuc.com now to see the best up-to-date Shattuc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shattuc.com

Shattuc Cord Specialties manufactures and assembles cable, wire, and fiber optic products for the audio, visual, and broadcast industries.

Visit shattuc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shattuc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 588 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shattuc.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.shattuc.com

588 ms

js

69 ms

awesomplete.css

17 ms

joomla-alert.min.css

32 ms

style.css

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Shattuc.com, 23% (19 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube-nocookie.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (668 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 77.1 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shattuc.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 584.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 56.6 kB
  • After minification 48.9 kB
  • After compression 11.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 26.4 kB

  • Original 584.8 kB
  • After minification 558.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shattuc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 460.2 kB
  • After minification 460.2 kB
  • After compression 457.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 255.8 kB
  • After minification 255.5 kB
  • After compression 253.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shattuc.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (68%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shattuc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

shattuc.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

shattuc.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shattuc.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shattuc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shattuc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shattuc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: