Access snapt-ui.com.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

www.snapt.net

197 ms

gtm.js

129 ms

plausible.js

173 ms

Back%20view%20of%20businessman%20with%20suitcase%20in%20hands%20looking%20at%20virtual%20panel-1.jpeg

301 ms

Hand%20drawn%20business%20ideas%20sketch%20against%20white%20background.jpeg

336 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Snapt-ui.com, 13% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (376 ms) relates to the external source Snapt.net.

Content Size

815.1 kB

After Optimization

258.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Snapt-ui.com main page is 815.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 785.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 556.0 kB

Original 785.5 kB
After minification 764.8 kB
After compression 229.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 556.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 212 B

Original 29.0 kB
After minification 28.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snapt Ui images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 15 B

Original 562 B
After minification 562 B
After compression 547 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snapt Ui. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.