3.4 sec in total
179 ms
2.7 sec
447 ms
Visit buzzinglikes.com now to see the best up-to-date Buzzing Likes content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about buzzinglikes.com
If you're looking to buy real social media followers and likes, you've come to the right place. Fast delivery, with real engagement.
Visit buzzinglikes.comWe analyzed Buzzinglikes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
buzzinglikes.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.059
98/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
179 ms
264 ms
361 ms
422 ms
732 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Buzzinglikes.com, 43% (36 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Buzzinglikes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 433.9 kB (45%)
969.6 kB
535.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Buzzinglikes.com main page is 969.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 774.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 162.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 271.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Buzzing Likes needs image optimization as it can save up to 271.2 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (76%)
41
10
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buzzing Likes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
buzzinglikes.com
179 ms
buzzinglikes.com
264 ms
378e5442ad5f4cabfc2d16f94f68f3b6.css
361 ms
style.css
422 ms
jquery.min.js
732 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
639 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
613 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
754 ms
js.cookie.min.js
518 ms
woocommerce.min.js
518 ms
slick.min.js
612 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
613 ms
scripts.min.js
848 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
930 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
869 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
920 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
937 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
929 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
915 ms
dom-ready.min.js
941 ms
hooks.min.js
996 ms
i18n.min.js
1115 ms
a11y.min.js
1100 ms
jquery.json.min.js
1080 ms
gravityforms.min.js
1148 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
1044 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
1111 ms
core.min.js
1158 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
1360 ms
common.js
1306 ms
tvc-ee-google-analytics.js
1363 ms
sticky-elements.js
1566 ms
lazyload.min.js
1553 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-11-03-at-11.16.06.png
325 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-11-03-at-11.16.06.png
1085 ms
css
75 ms
font
95 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4n.ttf
120 ms
font
215 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
120 ms
font
161 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
120 ms
font
101 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
120 ms
font
121 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
121 ms
font
215 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
122 ms
modules.woff
1381 ms
font
51 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
52 ms
font
52 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf
53 ms
font
53 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
86 ms
font
84 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
85 ms
font
86 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
86 ms
font
87 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf
87 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1286 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
963 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1001 ms
font
143 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf
87 ms
font
143 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf
87 ms
font
121 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUE.ttf
87 ms
font
121 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvgUE.ttf
121 ms
font
141 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf
121 ms
font
199 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf
141 ms
new-buzzinglikes-logo-grey-bg-1.png
374 ms
New-Project-2.png
332 ms
Mobile-Marketing-pana.png
306 ms
Marketing-consulting-pana.png
316 ms
buy-soundcloud-plays-cheap-testimonial-2.jpg
460 ms
buy-soundcloud-plays-cheap.jpg
452 ms
buy-soundcloud-plays-cheap-testimonial.jpg
645 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
76 ms
buzzinglikes.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
buzzinglikes.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
buzzinglikes.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buzzinglikes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buzzinglikes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
buzzinglikes.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Buzzing Likes. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: