Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

spacebag.com

Ziploc: Everyday Food Storage Bags & Containers | SC Johnson

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

About Website

Visit spacebag.com now to see the best up-to-date Spacebag content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about spacebag.com

Life can be pretty messy. From food storage bags to oven-safe containers, Ziploc has what you need to contain it. Find your storage bag & container solution!

Visit spacebag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Spacebag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

spacebag.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value31.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ziploc.com

73 ms

dg.js

275 ms

js

188 ms

redesign_en.css

810 ms

jquery.xdomainrequest.min.js

800 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Spacebag.com, 24% (25 requests) were made to Ziploc.com and 10% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Ziploc-uc1.azureedge.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (38%)

Content Size

8.4 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Spacebag.com main page is 8.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 101.8 kB

  • Original 117.8 kB
  • After minification 88.8 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.9 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 6.5 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Spacebag needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 441.1 kB

  • Original 545.4 kB
  • After minification 544.0 kB
  • After compression 104.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 441.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 145.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spacebag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (38%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

57

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spacebag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

spacebag.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

spacebag.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

spacebag.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Spacebag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Spacebag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Spacebag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: