Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

starwoodsystems.com

Northampton Web design | website construction for business

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

555 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

184 ms

About Website

Visit starwoodsystems.com now to see the best up-to-date Starwoodsystems content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about starwoodsystems.com

web site construction, management and development focused on business growth. We take care of the code, you take care of your business. Visit us now

Visit starwoodsystems.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Starwoodsystems.com page load time and found that the first response time was 555 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

starwoodsystems.com performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

94/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.131

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

starwoodsystems.com

555 ms

A.plugins,,_system,,_jce,,_css,,_content.css,,qbadb4208be409b1335b815dde676300e+plugins,,_system,,_rokbox,,_assets,,_styles,,_rokbox.css+components,,_com_roksprocket,,_layouts,,_features,,_themes,,_showcase,,_showcase.css+media,,_gantry5,,_engines,,_nucleus,,_css-compiled,,_nucleus.css+templates,,_g5_helium,,_custom,,_css-compiled,,_helium_25.css+media,,_gantry5,,_assets,,_css,,_bootstrap-gantry.css+media,,_gantry5,,_engines,,_nucleus,,_css-compiled,,_joomla.css+media,,_jui,,_css,,_icomoon.css+media,,_gantry5,,_assets,,_css,,_font-awesome.min.css+templates,,_g5_helium,,_custom,,_css-compiled,,_helium-joomla_25.css+templates,,_g5_helium,,_custom,,_css-compiled,,_custom_25.css+templates,,_g5_helium,,_custom,,_css,,_animate.min.css,Mcc.68NgHbtIhU.css.pagespeed.cf.hlNCgKx_f6.css

168 ms

jquery.min.js,q53b3f7149271cfd2ee33da238aff2c1a.pagespeed.jm.Esjhv-eXHl.js

323 ms

jui,_js,_jquery-noconflict.js,q53b3f7149271cfd2ee33da238aff2c1a+jui,_js,_jquery-migrate.min.js,q53b3f7149271cfd2ee33da238aff2c1a+system,_js,_caption.js,q53b3f7149271cfd2ee33da238aff2c1a.pagespeed.jc.pjxECKH9Xd.js

243 ms

mootools-core.js,q53b3f7149271cfd2ee33da238aff2c1a.pagespeed.jm.ywlvbuicbl.js

320 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Starwoodsystems.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (555 ms) belongs to the original domain Starwoodsystems.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 16.2 kB (8%)

Content Size

205.6 kB

After Optimization

189.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Starwoodsystems.com main page is 205.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 67.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 15.4 kB

  • Original 22.5 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 482 B

  • Original 58.3 kB
  • After minification 57.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Starwoodsystems images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 378 B

  • Original 67.7 kB
  • After minification 67.7 kB
  • After compression 67.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 57.1 kB
  • After minification 57.1 kB
  • After compression 57.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starwoodsystems.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (63%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Starwoodsystems. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

starwoodsystems.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

starwoodsystems.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

starwoodsystems.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Starwoodsystems.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Starwoodsystems.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Starwoodsystems. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: