Access swasthum.com. Swasthum--Manufacturing

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,000 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.121

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value32.9 s

0/100

10%

swasthum.com

1908 ms

icons.css

723 ms

widgets_style.css

978 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

738 ms

style.min.css

1029 ms

Our browser made a total of 238 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (202 requests) were addressed to the original Swasthum.com, 5% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 5% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Swasthum.com.

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Swasthum.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 252.7 kB

Original 287.9 kB
After minification 280.5 kB
After compression 35.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 252.7 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 2.2 MB

Original 2.9 MB
After minification 765.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Swasthum needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.2 MB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 90.6 kB

Original 484.6 kB
After minification 484.6 kB
After compression 394.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.6 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 78.8 kB

Original 274.9 kB
After minification 274.9 kB
After compression 196.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swasthum.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.8 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Now

220

After Optimization

135

The browser has sent 220 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swasthum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.