Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

therailsidebar.com

Home - Railside Bar & Grill

Page Load Speed

9.9 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

8.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Visit therailsidebar.com now to see the best up-to-date The Railside Bar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about therailsidebar.com

Visit therailsidebar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Therailsidebar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

therailsidebar.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.321

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

therailsidebar.com

181 ms

therailsidebar.com

6330 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

204 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

195 ms

utilities.css

196 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Therailsidebar.com, 37% (23 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 22% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Therailsidebar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 333.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Therailsidebar.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 263.4 kB

  • Original 298.8 kB
  • After minification 293.0 kB
  • After compression 35.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 263.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 57 B

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Railside Bar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 42.3 kB

  • Original 176.5 kB
  • After minification 176.5 kB
  • After compression 134.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 27.9 kB

  • Original 42.6 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Therailsidebar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (39%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Railside Bar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

therailsidebar.com accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

therailsidebar.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

therailsidebar.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Therailsidebar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Therailsidebar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Railside Bar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: