Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

tickcontrol.in

Tick treatment for dogs - How to remove a tick for dog - tick removal

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

929 ms

About Website

Visit tickcontrol.in now to see the best up-to-date Tick Control content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tickcontrol.in

Hostel for dogs Chennai rendering the best Tick Removal services in our country. Our dedicated groomers ensure complete removal of Ticks / Flea on the affected dogs. Our Tick control services ensure c...

Visit tickcontrol.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Tickcontrol.in page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tickcontrol.in performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,660 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.447

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tickcontrol.in

13 ms

tickremoval.in

167 ms

bootstrap.min.css

43 ms

animate.css

38 ms

font-awesome.css

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tickcontrol.in, 70% (51 requests) were made to Tickremoval.in and 10% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (824 ms) relates to the external source Tickremoval.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 505.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Tickcontrol.in main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 30.0 kB

  • Original 36.8 kB
  • After minification 29.4 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 468.2 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tick Control needs image optimization as it can save up to 468.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 200.8 kB
  • After minification 200.8 kB
  • After compression 198.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 81.0 kB
  • After compression 76.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tickcontrol.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (22%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tick Control. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tickcontrol.in accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

tickcontrol.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tickcontrol.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tickcontrol.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tickcontrol.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tick Control. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: