Access tool.report. Power Tool Reviews & Buyer's Guides

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

www.tool.report

2309 ms

style.min.css

21 ms

dashicons.min.css

28 ms

sassy-social-share-public.css

43 ms

jquery.min.js

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Tool.report, 17% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Tool.report.

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Tool.report main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-96%

Potential reduce by 464.6 kB

Original 482.9 kB
After minification 139.5 kB
After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 343.4 kB, which is 71% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 464.6 kB or 96% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 53.5 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 82 B

Original 109.9 kB
After minification 109.9 kB
After compression 109.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

Original 72.3 kB
After minification 72.3 kB
After compression 70.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tool.report has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.