Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

tribunalclaim.com

No Win No Fee Employment Solicitors | Tribunal Claim Lawyers - Call Now

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

321 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

About Website

Welcome to tribunalclaim.com homepage info - get ready to check Tribunal Claim best content right away, or after learning these important things about tribunalclaim.com

We are the no win no fee employment solicitors for you. Experts in all areas of employment law. Free consultations. We can speak to you now.

Visit tribunalclaim.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tribunalclaim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 321 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tribunalclaim.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tribunalclaim.com

321 ms

www.tribunalclaim.com

892 ms

abazx.css

174 ms

abazx.css

262 ms

abazx.css

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Tribunalclaim.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to Reviewsolicitors.co.uk and 3% (1 request) were made to Widgets.leadconnectorhq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (892 ms) belongs to the original domain Tribunalclaim.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.4 kB (26%)

Content Size

466.5 kB

After Optimization

343.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tribunalclaim.com main page is 466.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 189.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 122.9 kB

  • Original 158.4 kB
  • After minification 158.2 kB
  • After compression 35.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 307 B

  • Original 189.0 kB
  • After minification 188.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tribunal Claim images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 69 B

  • Original 90.9 kB
  • After minification 90.9 kB
  • After compression 90.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 202 B

  • Original 28.3 kB
  • After minification 28.3 kB
  • After compression 28.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tribunalclaim.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tribunal Claim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

tribunalclaim.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

tribunalclaim.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tribunalclaim.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tribunalclaim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tribunalclaim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tribunal Claim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: