Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

tuftstree.com

Certified Arborist for Kansas City - Tuft's Tree Service

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

635 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

550 ms

About Website

Welcome to tuftstree.com homepage info - get ready to check Tuft S Tree best content right away, or after learning these important things about tuftstree.com

Certified Arborist offering expert consultation and tree services- trimming, removal, fine pruning, stump grinding for Kansas City Metro.

Visit tuftstree.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tuftstree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 635 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tuftstree.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value47.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.156

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tuftstree.com

635 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

42 ms

styles.css

49 ms

js_composer.min.css

98 ms

css

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Tuftstree.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (635 ms) belongs to the original domain Tuftstree.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (35%)

Content Size

8.3 MB

After Optimization

5.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Tuftstree.com main page is 8.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

  • Original 65.8 kB
  • After minification 65.0 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 6.5 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tuft S Tree needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 220.2 kB

  • Original 308.8 kB
  • After minification 308.8 kB
  • After compression 88.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 220.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 163.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tuftstree.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (73%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tuft S Tree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tuftstree.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

tuftstree.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuftstree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tuftstree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tuft S Tree. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: