Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

ultrasonic.cleaning

Ultrasonic Cleaning Co. - Ultrasonic Parts Cleaning and Testing Services

Page Load Speed

269 ms in total

First Response

107 ms

Resources Loaded

112 ms

Page Rendered

50 ms

About Website

Visit ultrasonic.cleaning now to see the best up-to-date Ultrasonic content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ultrasonic.cleaning

Ultrasonic cleaning and washing of specialized machinery parts including certifications as well as pressure and leak testing.

Visit ultrasonic.cleaning

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultrasonic.cleaning page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 162 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultrasonic.cleaning performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,680 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ultrasonic.cleaning

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ultrasonic.cleaning and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (107 ms) belongs to the original domain Ultrasonic.cleaning.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 348.8 kB (35%)

Content Size

983.1 kB

After Optimization

634.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Ultrasonic.cleaning main page is 983.1 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 561.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 103 B
  • After minification 102 B
  • After compression 92 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11 B or 11% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 239.8 kB
  • After minification 238.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultrasonic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 26.7 kB

  • Original 181.3 kB
  • After minification 181.3 kB
  • After compression 154.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 321.0 kB

  • Original 561.9 kB
  • After minification 561.6 kB
  • After compression 240.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultrasonic.cleaning needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 321.0 kB or 57% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

ultrasonic.cleaning accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ultrasonic.cleaning best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ultrasonic.cleaning SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultrasonic.cleaning can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ultrasonic.cleaning main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultrasonic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: