Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

uridoki.net

買取比較はウリドキ！1番高い業者が無料で見つかるサイト

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

531 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

About Website

Visit uridoki.net now to see the best up-to-date Uridoki content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about uridoki.net

ウリドキは買取価格を比較してかんたんにモノが売れるサービスです。複数のプロの査定士による一括査定で価格がすぐに分かり、最高額で売ることが出来ます。商品の受け渡しも自宅にいながら宅配買取でかんたんに行えます。ぜひモノを売るならウリドキにお任せください！

Visit uridoki.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Uridoki.net page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

uridoki.net performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,350 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

uridoki.net

531 ms

uridoki.net

857 ms

application-74509a023867b7ce1eb5248b9a7149380cc81c11afdd188f38f0a0a9526e54b8.css

305 ms

application-ecb3fc345044cc7dc4a37e5bd12fdb9dc713a971959b1e61801a8a423223d507.js

610 ms

jsapi

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 194 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (98 requests) were addressed to the original Uridoki.net, 33% (64 requests) were made to S3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com and 12% (24 requests) were made to Pix-production.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Pix-production.s3.ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 728.3 kB (5%)

Content Size

13.9 MB

After Optimization

13.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Uridoki.net main page is 13.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 184.6 kB

  • Original 216.9 kB
  • After minification 215.1 kB
  • After compression 32.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 543.1 kB

  • Original 13.4 MB
  • After minification 12.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Uridoki images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 146 B

  • Original 169.4 kB
  • After minification 169.4 kB
  • After compression 169.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 521 B

  • Original 98.5 kB
  • After minification 98.5 kB
  • After compression 98.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uridoki.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (6%)

Requests Now

187

After Optimization

176

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 187 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Uridoki. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

uridoki.net accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

uridoki.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

uridoki.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Uridoki.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Uridoki.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Uridoki. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: