Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

ushake.com

Ushake.com offers paint shakers and paint mixers | F5 and Blair Tornado II

Page Load Speed

20.3 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

20 sec

Page Rendered

148 ms

About Website

Visit ushake.com now to see the best up-to-date Ushake content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ushake.com

Ushake.com is your resource for commercial quality electric paint shakers. We are dedicated to bringing you the most in demand paint shaker brands such as the F5 and Blair Tornado II. Truly effective,...

Visit ushake.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ushake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 20.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

ushake.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,350 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.213

58/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ushake.com

131 ms

www.ushake.com

56 ms

default.aspx

138 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

101 ms

fancy.css

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Ushake.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.7 sec) relates to the external source Chat.webdirectbrands.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.3 kB (14%)

Content Size

635.7 kB

After Optimization

545.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ushake.com main page is 635.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 266.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 33.8 kB

  • Original 43.9 kB
  • After minification 33.8 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.1 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 243.6 kB
  • After minification 239.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ushake images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 45.5 kB

  • Original 266.4 kB
  • After minification 265.3 kB
  • After compression 220.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 81.7 kB
  • After minification 81.6 kB
  • After compression 75.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ushake.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (29%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

48

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ushake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ushake.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ushake.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ushake.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ushake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ushake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ushake. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: