Access vademecum.com. Vademecum España para el médico, farmacéutico y particular

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,470 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.7 s

5/100

10%

vademecum.com

210 ms

www.vademecum.com

378 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

42 ms

popper.min.js

87 ms

bootstrap.min.js

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Vademecum.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 12% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (623 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Vademecum.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 39.5 kB

Original 50.5 kB
After minification 47.8 kB
After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 55 B

Original 92.0 kB
After minification 91.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vademecum images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 382.4 kB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 1.3 MB
After compression 899.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 382.4 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

Original 19.4 kB
After minification 19.4 kB
After compression 16.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vademecum.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vademecum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.