Access videocutter.in. Online Video Cutter Free - Without Watermark

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

23/100

10%

videocutter.in

178 ms

adsbygoogle.js

144 ms

js

106 ms

gtm.js

192 ms

bootstrap.css

438 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Videocutter.in, 18% (3 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 12% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (843 ms) belongs to the original domain Videocutter.in.

Content Size

969.2 kB

After Optimization

408.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Videocutter.in main page is 969.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 689.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

Original 15.9 kB
After minification 14.5 kB
After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

Original 8.8 kB
After minification 7.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Video Cutter needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 326.8 kB

Original 689.8 kB
After minification 689.8 kB
After compression 363.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 326.8 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 221.5 kB

Original 254.7 kB
After minification 208.8 kB
After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videocutter.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 221.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Video Cutter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.