Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

visionalive.net

The original breathrough Vision Alive Max formula with Lutemax® 2020, Bilberries, Blueberries, c3g from Black Currant, Maqui Berry, and Astaxanthin

Page Load Speed

9.7 sec in total

First Response

3.6 sec

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

About Website

Welcome to visionalive.net homepage info - get ready to check Vision Alive best content for Singapore right away, or after learning these important things about visionalive.net

Vision Alive is an advanced formula designed for individuals diagnosed with moderate to advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and support healthy eyes.

Visit visionalive.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Visionalive.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.6 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visionalive.net performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,270 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visionalive.net

3616 ms

css2

42 ms

css2

57 ms

css

65 ms

css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 152 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Visionalive.net, 19% (29 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (18 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Visionalive.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (9%)

Content Size

16.2 MB

After Optimization

14.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Visionalive.net main page is 16.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 15.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 282.1 kB

  • Original 310.9 kB
  • After minification 265.9 kB
  • After compression 28.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 282.1 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 15.4 MB
  • After minification 14.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vision Alive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 499.7 kB
  • After minification 499.7 kB
  • After compression 490.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 62.6 kB
  • After minification 62.6 kB
  • After compression 58.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visionalive.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (43%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

57

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vision Alive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

visionalive.net accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

visionalive.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

visionalive.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visionalive.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visionalive.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vision Alive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: