Access windmilleye.com. Eye Doctors in Sylvan Grove

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,400 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.102

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

10/100

10%

windmilleye.com

62 ms

www.windmilleye.com

94 ms

css2

31 ms

script.js

108 ms

4008_9b6e1d90-8bd0-4021-b1a8-ad8d4fa12a24.png

136 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Windmilleye.com, 36% (29 requests) were made to Storage.googleapis.com and 16% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (608 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Windmilleye.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 119.9 kB

Original 151.4 kB
After minification 151.3 kB
After compression 31.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 348.9 kB

Original 2.3 MB
After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Windmill Eye needs image optimization as it can save up to 348.9 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 657 B

Original 394.0 kB
After minification 393.9 kB
After compression 393.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 2.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Windmill Eye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.