1.4 sec in total
321 ms
1.1 sec
0 ms
Visit wtter.net now to see the best up-to-date Wtter content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wtter.net
Leistungsstarke & hochverfügbare Hosting-Lösungen aus Europa rund um Domain, Website, Online-Shop, Cloud. 30 Jahre Erfahrung & Top-Kundenservice.
Visit wtter.netWe analyzed Wtter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 321 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
wtter.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value1,000 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
321 ms
760 ms
Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wtter.net, 50% (1 request) were made to A.partner-versicherung.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (760 ms) relates to the external source A.partner-versicherung.de.
Page size can be reduced by 187 B (41%)
454 B
267 B
In fact, the total size of Wtter.net main page is 454 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 454 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 187 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 187 B or 41% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
0
0
Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
wtter.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wtter.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wtter.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
N/A
ISO-8859-15
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wtter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wtter.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-15. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
{{og_description}}
wtter.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wtter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: