Access zatelemad.com. One moment, please...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.15

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

zatelemad.com

226 ms

www.zatelemad.com

1114 ms

js

55 ms

javascript;base64,CiAgd2luZG93LmRhdGFMYXllciA9IHdpbmRvdy5kYXRhTGF5ZXIgfHwgW107CiAgZnVuY3Rpb24gZ3RhZygpe2RhdGFMYXllci5wdXNoKGFyZ3VtZW50cyk7fQogIGd0YWcoJ2pzJywgbmV3IERhdGUoKSk7CgogIGd0YWcoJ2NvbmZpZycsICdVQS0xMTM1MDc2NTktMScpOwo=

1 ms

dChlLmNvbmNhdGVtb2ppKTplLndwZW1vamkmJmUudHdlbW9qaSYmKHQoZS50d2Vtb2ppKSx0KGUud3BlbW9qaSkpKX0pKX0oKHdpbmRvdyxkb2N1bWVudCksd2luZG93Ll93cGVtb2ppU2V0dGluZ3MpOwovKiBdXT4gKi8K

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Zatelemad.com, 19% (7 requests) were made to and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Zatelemad.com.

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

900.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Zatelemad.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 93.1 kB

Original 117.2 kB
After minification 117.1 kB
After compression 24.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 502.4 kB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 814.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zatelemad needs image optimization as it can save up to 502.4 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

Original 36.8 kB
After minification 36.8 kB
After compression 36.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 25 B

Original 24.4 kB
After minification 24.4 kB
After compression 24.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zatelemad.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zatelemad. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.