Tools & Wizards About Us
beeweb.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 78

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    39% of websites

beeweb.co.uk

Cavespider Productions - Website Design and production - Website design in Sutton Bridge, Long Sutton and East Anglia

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

377 ms

beeweb.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to beeweb.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Beeweb best content right away, or after learning these important things about beeweb.co.uk

We have a policy, we build the website your company needs and wants. Making a website that does the job and does it well takes a team. A team of experts each to

Visit beeweb.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Beeweb.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beeweb.co.uk performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.237

52/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.7 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cavespider.co.uk

1028 ms

fontawesome.css

501 ms

joomla-alert.css

229 ms

debug.css

205 ms

content.min.css

205 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Beeweb.co.uk, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Cavespider.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (56%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beeweb.co.uk main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 141.3 kB

  • Original 169.0 kB
  • After minification 167.0 kB
  • After compression 27.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 141.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 464.4 kB
  • After minification 450.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beeweb images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 604.3 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 993.6 kB
  • After compression 427.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 604.3 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 497.4 kB

  • Original 595.3 kB
  • After minification 529.5 kB
  • After compression 97.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beeweb.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 497.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (71%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beeweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cavespider.co.uk

cavespider.co.uk

1028 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

501 ms

joomla-alert.css

joomla-alert.css

229 ms

debug.css

debug.css

205 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

205 ms

style.css

style.css

652 ms

cavespider-style.css

cavespider-style.css

272 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

830 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

331 ms

core.js

core.js

436 ms

collapse.js

collapse.js

400 ms

messages.js

messages.js

455 ms

debug.js

debug.js

514 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

700 ms

logic.js

logic.js

641 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

js

js

65 ms

ba_modal.js

ba_modal.js

685 ms

ba-style.css

ba-style.css

745 ms

ba-effects.css

ba-effects.css

785 ms

ba_isotope.js

ba_isotope.js

774 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

798 ms

ba-gallery.js

ba-gallery.js

987 ms

script.js

script.js

986 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

920 ms

script.js

script.js

920 ms

front.css

front.css

920 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

974 ms

github.css

github.css

957 ms

debugbar.css

debugbar.css

962 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

961 ms

openhandler.css

openhandler.css

996 ms

widget.min.css

widget.min.css

1019 ms

widget.min.css

widget.min.css

1024 ms

highlight.pack.js

highlight.pack.js

1327 ms

debugbar.js

debugbar.js

1096 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

1082 ms

openhandler.js

openhandler.js

1098 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

1097 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

1029 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

33 ms

material.css

material.css

537 ms

logo-main.png

logo-main.png

142 ms

default-lazy-load.webp

default-lazy-load.webp

124 ms

logop-roudelborder.png

logop-roudelborder.png

141 ms

facebook-icon.png

facebook-icon.png

145 ms

twitter-icon.png

twitter-icon.png

141 ms

bannerBG-hp.jpg

bannerBG-hp.jpg

213 ms

OurSay-BG.png

OurSay-BG.png

232 ms

Folio-BG.png

Folio-BG.png

241 ms

support-BG.png

support-BG.png

289 ms

WSproduction-BG.png

WSproduction-BG.png

237 ms

homepage-mainImage.jpg

homepage-mainImage.jpg

269 ms

font

font

22 ms

cavespider.co.uk

cavespider.co.uk

882 ms

arrow-4.svg

arrow-4.svg

324 ms

Accessibility Review

beeweb.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

beeweb.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

beeweb.co.uk SEO score

78

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beeweb.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beeweb.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beeweb.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Beeweb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: