Tools & Wizards About Us
bestbettingsites2016.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

bestbettingsites2016.com

Best Betting Sites 2024 - Bet on the UK Leaders in Internet

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

294 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

240 ms

bestbettingsites2016.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bestbettingsites2016.com homepage info - get ready to check Best Betting Sites 2016 best content right away, or after learning these important things about bestbettingsites2016.com

Find here the best online betting sites UK for 2024 and enjoy their amazing welcome bonus offers! Bet now and have fun!

Visit bestbettingsites2016.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestbettingsites2016.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestbettingsites2016.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,210 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestbettingsites2016.com

294 ms

www.bestbettingsites2016.com

215 ms

www.bestbettingsites2016.com

356 ms

style.css

276 ms

logo.png

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Bestbettingsites2016.com, 23% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (356 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestbettingsites2016.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 16.2 kB (6%)

Content Size

293.3 kB

After Optimization

277.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bestbettingsites2016.com main page is 293.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 187.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 17.0 kB
  • After minification 16.6 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 21.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Best Betting Sites 2016 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 187.6 kB
  • After minification 187.6 kB
  • After compression 184.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 313 B

  • Original 64.3 kB
  • After minification 64.3 kB
  • After compression 64.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bestbettingsites2016.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (35%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Best Betting Sites 2016. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bestbettingsites2016.com

bestbettingsites2016.com

294 ms

www.bestbettingsites2016.com

www.bestbettingsites2016.com

215 ms

www.bestbettingsites2016.com

www.bestbettingsites2016.com

356 ms

style.css

style.css

276 ms

logo.png

logo.png

20 ms

regulation-sign.png

regulation-sign.png

23 ms

wJ0MlZrToZs

wJ0MlZrToZs

90 ms

sportingbet-play-on-the-go.png

sportingbet-play-on-the-go.png

36 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

10 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

25 ms

base.js

base.js

48 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

186 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

181 ms

logos.png

logos.png

172 ms

UCY5Klx_0fJhMytIltuKLUwnjJON9GWedkq6jjIrpW0.js

UCY5Klx_0fJhMytIltuKLUwnjJON9GWedkq6jjIrpW0.js

114 ms

embed.js

embed.js

27 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

51 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

58 ms

id

id

29 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

Create

Create

94 ms

js

js

159 ms

Accessibility Review

bestbettingsites2016.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

bestbettingsites2016.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bestbettingsites2016.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestbettingsites2016.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestbettingsites2016.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bestbettingsites2016.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Best Betting Sites 2016. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: