Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

bestforbeauty.de

Liegenbezüge und Handtücher für Ihre Praxis–BfB b2b Webshop

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

758 ms

Page Rendered

137 ms

bestforbeauty.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bestforbeauty.de homepage info - get ready to check Bestforbeauty best content right away, or after learning these important things about bestforbeauty.de

Ihre Händler von Liegenbezüge und Handtücher. Wir die bfb GmbH haben uns auf den Großhandel von Medical, Beauty und Wellness Produkten spezialisiert.

Visit bestforbeauty.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Bestforbeauty.de page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 895 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bestforbeauty.de performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bestforbeauty.de

362 ms

ga.js

9 ms

bestforbeauty-header.png

290 ms

bg.gif

128 ms

imagebild_startseite.jpg

424 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Bestforbeauty.de, 17% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (424 ms) belongs to the original domain Bestforbeauty.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.9 kB (11%)

Content Size

125.0 kB

After Optimization

111.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Bestforbeauty.de main page is 125.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 98.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 9.0 kB
  • After minification 8.6 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 98.8 kB
  • After minification 90.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bestforbeauty images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (55%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bestforbeauty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bestforbeauty.de accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

bestforbeauty.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

bestforbeauty.de SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bestforbeauty.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bestforbeauty.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bestforbeauty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: