Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

bezoekersnamenlijst.nl

Bezoekersnamenlijst | Website Bezoekers Analyse | Websitebezoekers

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

273 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

123 ms

bezoekersnamenlijst.nl screenshot

About Website

Visit bezoekersnamenlijst.nl now to see the best up-to-date Bezoekersnamenlijst content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bezoekersnamenlijst.nl

Ook benieuwd welke bedrijven uw website bezoeken? De Bezoekersnamenlijst identificeert bedrijven en organisaties inclusief hun gebruikte zoekopdracht. Probeer het 2 weken gratis.

Visit bezoekersnamenlijst.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Bezoekersnamenlijst.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bezoekersnamenlijst.nl performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.158

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bezoekersnamenlijst.nl

273 ms

bezoekersnamenlijst.nl

372 ms

www.bezoekersnamenlijst.nl

270 ms

www.bezoekersnamenlijst.nl

570 ms

css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Bezoekersnamenlijst.nl, 15% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (570 ms) belongs to the original domain Bezoekersnamenlijst.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.7 kB (26%)

Content Size

143.5 kB

After Optimization

106.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Bezoekersnamenlijst.nl main page is 143.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 110.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 15.7 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 25.2 kB

  • Original 110.7 kB
  • After minification 85.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bezoekersnamenlijst needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.2 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bezoekersnamenlijst. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

bezoekersnamenlijst.nl accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

bezoekersnamenlijst.nl best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bezoekersnamenlijst.nl SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bezoekersnamenlijst.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bezoekersnamenlijst.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bezoekersnamenlijst. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: