Tools & Wizards About Us
bick.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bick.com

Architectural Design Firm | Overland Park, KS - Bickford and Company

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

72 ms

Resources Loaded

530 ms

Page Rendered

705 ms

bick.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bick.com now to see the best up-to-date Bick content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bick.com

Bickford and Company is an architectural design firm in Overland Park, KS, that will make your new home dreams a reality. Call for an appointment.

Visit bick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bick.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bick.com

72 ms

www.bick.com

110 ms

Bickford-and-Company-logo-640w-105w.png

163 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

34 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Bick.com, 36% (4 requests) were made to Static.cdn-website.com and 36% (4 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (163 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.0 kB (36%)

Content Size

334.7 kB

After Optimization

212.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Bick.com main page is 334.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 159.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 116.2 kB

  • Original 159.1 kB
  • After minification 155.2 kB
  • After compression 42.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 42.0 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bick needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 108 B

  • Original 133.6 kB
  • After minification 133.6 kB
  • After compression 133.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bick. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

bick.com

bick.com

72 ms

www.bick.com

www.bick.com

110 ms

Bickford-and-Company-logo-640w-105w.png

Bickford-and-Company-logo-640w-105w.png

163 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

34 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

50 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

101 ms

bickford-and-company-7b1474ae-1920w.jpg

bickford-and-company-7b1474ae-1920w.jpg

129 ms

bickford-and-company2-720w.jpg

bickford-and-company2-720w.jpg

144 ms

Bickford-and-Company-logo-640w-228w.png

Bickford-and-Company-logo-640w-228w.png

105 ms

TrajanPro-Bold-8c3c_400.otf

TrajanPro-Bold-8c3c_400.otf

129 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3 ms

Accessibility Review

bick.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

bick.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bick.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bick.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: