Tools & Wizards About Us
bispl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

bispl.com

Introduction to Bell Infotech Systems

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

995 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

199 ms

bispl.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to bispl.com homepage info - get ready to check Bispl best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about bispl.com

Learn about Knowledge Fortune IT Services ,Custom Software Development ,IT Infrastructure Management ,Website development, SEO, Digital Marketing and more at the Official Knowledge Fortune Inc ® Websi...

Visit bispl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bispl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 995 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bispl.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.285

42/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bispl.com

995 ms

bootstrap.min.css

222 ms

style.css

153 ms

blue.css

164 ms

wide.css

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Bispl.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (995 ms) belongs to the original domain Bispl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 246.3 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Bispl.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 930.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 29.8 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 33.3 kB, which is 53% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 71.4 kB

  • Original 930.5 kB
  • After minification 859.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bispl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 96.0 kB

  • Original 231.9 kB
  • After minification 231.9 kB
  • After compression 136.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.0 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 64.9 kB
  • After minification 64.8 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bispl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (56%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bispl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

bispl.com

bispl.com

995 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

222 ms

style.css

style.css

153 ms

blue.css

blue.css

164 ms

wide.css

wide.css

164 ms

switcher.css

switcher.css

162 ms

event_calander.css

event_calander.css

162 ms

function_event_calandar.js

function_event_calandar.js

239 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

314 ms

jssor.slider-21.1.5.mini.js

jssor.slider-21.1.5.mini.js

313 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

393 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

172 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

228 ms

retina-1.1.0.min.js

retina-1.1.0.min.js

252 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

255 ms

styleswitch.js

styleswitch.js

305 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

327 ms

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.bootstrap.min.js

323 ms

jquery.jcarousel.js

jquery.jcarousel.js

332 ms

jflickrfeed.js

jflickrfeed.js

340 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

381 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

404 ms

swipe.js

swipe.js

406 ms

jquery.blurr.js

jquery.blurr.js

413 ms

main.js

main.js

418 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

379 ms

magnified.css

magnified.css

388 ms

css

css

22 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

48 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

121 ms

1_1.png

1_1.png

166 ms

process.gif

process.gif

165 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

348 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

215 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

290 ms

5_1.png

5_1.png

166 ms

6_2.png

6_2.png

433 ms

54_6.png

54_6.png

228 ms

55_1.png

55_1.png

248 ms

8_1.png

8_1.png

290 ms

8_2.png

8_2.png

298 ms

8_10.png

8_10.png

307 ms

8_11.png

8_11.png

363 ms

8_13.png

8_13.png

368 ms

8_14.png

8_14.png

377 ms

8_8.png

8_8.png

384 ms

8_6.png

8_6.png

422 ms

8_5.png

8_5.png

442 ms

8_9.png

8_9.png

447 ms

8_7.png

8_7.png

454 ms

8_12.png

8_12.png

462 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

9 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

28 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

27 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

48 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

299 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWCWtFCc.woff

48 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

49 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw3q5d0.woff

67 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKx8a8zI.woff

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKx8a8zI.woff

69 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEw8OPIDU.woff

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEw8OPIDU.woff

68 ms

Accessibility Review

bispl.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bispl.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bispl.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bispl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bispl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

bispl.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bispl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: