2.2 sec in total
33 ms
798 ms
1.4 sec
Welcome to bitebuff.com homepage info - get ready to check Bite Buff best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bitebuff.com
Visit bitebuff.comWe analyzed Bitebuff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
bitebuff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
91/100
10%
33 ms
114 ms
39 ms
50 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Bitebuff.com, 27% (20 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to 4.bp.blogspot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (395 ms) relates to the external source 4.bp.blogspot.com.
Page size can be reduced by 199.6 kB (18%)
1.1 MB
881.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Bitebuff.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 750.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 143.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bite Buff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 40.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bitebuff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (44%)
71
40
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bite Buff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bitebuff.com
33 ms
www.bitebuff.com
114 ms
webfont.js
39 ms
3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css
50 ms
gsearch.css
36 ms
authorization.css
88 ms
plusone.js
73 ms
3226477086-widgets.js
39 ms
jsapi
39 ms
css
24 ms
yellowTexture.png
195 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
157 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
187 ms
google_top_exp.js
179 ms
header.png
269 ms
icon18_wrench_allbkg.png
182 ms
icon18_edit_allbkg.gif
216 ms
IMG_0276.JPG
319 ms
IMG_0277.JPG
318 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
105 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_3
146 ms
fastbutton
172 ms
fastbutton
181 ms
fastbutton
167 ms
fastbutton
209 ms
fastbutton
207 ms
73 ms
IMG_0275.JPG
261 ms
IMG_0207.JPG
283 ms
IMG_0210.JPG
351 ms
IMG_0214.JPG
352 ms
IMG_0245.JPG
353 ms
twitter-bird2-square.png
185 ms
share_buttons_20_3.png
65 ms
logo-16.png
64 ms
icon18_email.gif
79 ms
IMG_0248.JPG
246 ms
IMG_0242.JPG
281 ms
rss-cube.png
64 ms
IMG_0286.JPG
258 ms
IMG_0208.JPG
277 ms
IMG_0209.JPG
277 ms
clear.gif
62 ms
12440314_1023155257745914_7864708618381765048_o.jpg
219 ms
IMG_0279.JPG
257 ms
IMG_0280.JPG
395 ms
IMG_0281.JPG
278 ms
IMG_0282.JPG
275 ms
IMG_0244.JPG
274 ms
IMG_0243.JPG
346 ms
BiteBuffLogo%2Bfinal.png
60 ms
facebook-logo-square.png
62 ms
C6HYlRF50SGJq1XyXj04z306qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
74 ms
blank.html
97 ms
navbar.g
87 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_4
75 ms
default+en.css
63 ms
default+en.I.js
74 ms
postmessageRelay
165 ms
rs=AGLTcCPp65oTnX7XI_ISus95mcUHkH7hXw
55 ms
icons_orange.png
137 ms
platform:gapi.iframes.style.common.js
109 ms
arrows-blue.png
158 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
71 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
71 ms
async-ads.js
127 ms
small-logo.png
52 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
117 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
43 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
41 ms
fastbutton
122 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
102 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
73 ms
postmessageRelay
47 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
bitebuff.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bitebuff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
bitebuff.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bitebuff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Bitebuff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bitebuff.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bite Buff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: