Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

bluearth.in

Fenice Energy: Rooftop Solar, On-grid and Hybrid solutions

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

242 ms

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

791 ms

bluearth.in screenshot

About Website

Visit bluearth.in now to see the best up-to-date Bluearth content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bluearth.in

Fenice Energy: Leading the Way in Rooftop Solar Solutions, Solar Panels, Microinverters, Solar Batteries, O&M Services, and EV Chargers for Sustainable Energy

Visit bluearth.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Bluearth.in page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bluearth.in performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value26.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value27,340 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value42.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bluearth.in

242 ms

sunedison.in

1559 ms

js

82 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

224 ms

style.min.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 201 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Bluearth.in, 72% (145 requests) were made to Sunedison.in and 9% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) relates to the external source Sunedison.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (35%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Bluearth.in main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 106.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bluearth images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 45.7 kB
  • After minification 45.5 kB
  • After compression 44.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 122 (76%)

Requests Now

161

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 161 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bluearth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 73 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 43 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bluearth.in accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bluearth.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

bluearth.in SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bluearth.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bluearth.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bluearth. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: