5.2 sec in total
980 ms
3.9 sec
349 ms
Click here to check amazing Bruxsafol content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about bruxsafol.de
Egal ob Gebäudefolien, Autofolien, Werkzeuge, Werbemittel oder Montageanfrage. Hier finden Sie alles, was das Folienherz begehrt.
Visit bruxsafol.deWe analyzed Bruxsafol.de page load time and found that the first response time was 980 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bruxsafol.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.088
92/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
980 ms
167 ms
188 ms
204 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Bruxsafol.de, 2% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Platform.linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Bruxsafol.de.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (18%)
10.3 MB
8.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Bruxsafol.de main page is 10.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bruxsafol images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 699.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 699.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bruxsafol.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (58%)
80
34
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bruxsafol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bruxsafol.de
980 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
167 ms
flipbook.style.css
188 ms
font-awesome.css
204 ms
settings.css
196 ms
bootstrap.min.css
302 ms
flexslider.css
211 ms
font-awesome.min.css
260 ms
prettyPhoto.css
279 ms
main.css
387 ms
animate.css
294 ms
app.css
308 ms
js_composer.css
461 ms
ubermenu.min.css
371 ms
vanilla.css
405 ms
font-awesome.min.css
406 ms
style.css
409 ms
style.min.css
479 ms
link-buttons.min.css
483 ms
perfect-scrollbar-0.4.6.min.css
497 ms
animate.min.css
501 ms
jquery.js
651 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
557 ms
flipbook.min.js
672 ms
embed.js
579 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
700 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
722 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
649 ms
font-awesome.min.css
616 ms
gravityforms_language-fix.js
717 ms
comment-reply.min.js
717 ms
bootstrap.min.js
717 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
717 ms
plugins.js
843 ms
main.js
757 ms
plusone.js
56 ms
widgets.js
32 ms
in.js
40 ms
js
44 ms
ubermenu.min.js
769 ms
script.min.js
699 ms
perfect-scrollbar-0.4.6.with-mousewheel.min.js
678 ms
wp-embed.min.js
672 ms
js_composer_front.js
788 ms
waypoints.min.js
799 ms
BRUXSAFOL-Logo-website-ebenen.png
546 ms
FB-f-Logo__blue_144.png
480 ms
Navigation-Icons-Sonnenschutz1.png
550 ms
Navigation-Icons-Sicherheit.png
546 ms
Navigation-Icons-Dekor.png
547 ms
Navigation-Icons-Autoglas-150x150.png
547 ms
Navigation-Icons-Wrapping.png
548 ms
Navigation-Icons-Lackschutz.png
550 ms
Navigation-Icons-Sonnenschutz2.png
554 ms
Navigation-Icons-Sicherheit1.png
555 ms
Navigation-Icons-Autoglas1.png
626 ms
Navigation-Icons-Wrapping1.png
550 ms
Navigation-Icons-Lackschutz1.png
578 ms
Navigation-Icon-Werkzeugkatalog-20150617.png
727 ms
CC-Camaro-2-e1436343407970.jpg
1160 ms
Dekofolien-Faltblatt03.jpg
2202 ms
Slider-Schiffsfolierung-1920x720.jpg
1515 ms
Sonnenschutz-1920x720.jpg
1151 ms
Slider-STX.jpg
1457 ms
Bruxsafol-Energieeffizienz.png
1381 ms
8485691_s-e1426351926545.jpg
1247 ms
Bruxsafol-Logos-EWFA.png
1252 ms
Bruxsafol-Logos-GEWA.png
1342 ms
Bruxsafol-Logos-DGNB.png
1337 ms
Bruxsafol-Logos-SKZ.png
1428 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1430 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1462 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1522 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
sdk.js
424 ms
collect
11 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
289 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
274 ms
loader.gif
1076 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1070 ms
revicons.woff
1091 ms
142 ms
xd_arbiter.php
147 ms
xd_arbiter.php
269 ms
Slider-STX-320x200.jpg
97 ms
Dekofolien-Faltblatt03-320x200.jpg
99 ms
bruxsafol.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
bruxsafol.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bruxsafol.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bruxsafol.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bruxsafol.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bruxsafol.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bruxsafol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: