2.8 sec in total
13 ms
1.7 sec
1.1 sec
Visit buzzback.com now to see the best up-to-date Buzzback content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about buzzback.com
Visit buzzback.comWe analyzed Buzzback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
buzzback.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value26.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value540 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.317
37/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
13 ms
157 ms
37 ms
209 ms
251 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Buzzback.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (886 ms) belongs to the original domain Buzzback.com.
Page size can be reduced by 141.6 kB (2%)
7.3 MB
7.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Buzzback.com main page is 7.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Buzzback images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Buzzback.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (52%)
66
32
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Buzzback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
buzzback.com
13 ms
www.buzzback.com
157 ms
jquery-1.7.1.js
37 ms
main.min.css
209 ms
theme-overrides.css
251 ms
module_124160828854_menu.min.css
434 ms
module_124160786952_banner.min.css
212 ms
module_124160828928_video-popup.css
231 ms
module_124160786946_title-content.min.css
419 ms
module_124160786947_counter.min.css
432 ms
module_124160828932_icon-box.min.css
462 ms
module_124160786951_card.min.css
463 ms
module_124160786949_partner.min.css
470 ms
slick-theme.min.css
47 ms
slick.min.css
59 ms
module_124160786950_testimonial.min.css
623 ms
module_124161163958_button.min.css
608 ms
module_124160786872_footer-nav.min.css
631 ms
js
80 ms
embed.js
62 ms
child.min.js
875 ms
library.min.js
875 ms
main.min.js
875 ms
project.js
807 ms
module_124160828854_menu.min.js
886 ms
glightbox.min.js
30 ms
jquery.countTo.min.js
58 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
59 ms
slick.min.js
56 ms
2011339.js
873 ms
index.js
873 ms
GLesxn7OiurW3uNDgkEZ
429 ms
fluent_star-16-filled.svg
311 ms
BuzzBack%20Logo%202019%20for%20web.png
180 ms
shutterstock_1865191480.png
223 ms
New%20Gradient-1.png
181 ms
Screenshot%202023-07-17%20at%203.30.59%20PM.png
221 ms
Untitled%20design%20(33)-1.png
325 ms
ribbon-2.png
352 ms
bullhorn-1.png
382 ms
Screenshot%202023-07-17%20at%204-12-39%20PM.png
443 ms
Screenshot%202023-07-17%20at%204-12-46%20PM.png
441 ms
Screenshot%202023-07-17%20at%204.12.59%20PM-1.png
469 ms
Screenshot%202023-07-17%20at%204.13.06%20PM-1.png
580 ms
Screenshot%202023-07-17%20at%204.13.14%20PM-1.png
597 ms
the%20buzz%20on%20the%20economy%20and%20wellbeing%20%20Social%20Post%201%20(1).png
413 ms
Studio%20Home%20Page%20Card.png
784 ms
Premium%20vs%20Value%20Social%20Post.png
475 ms
dole.png
473 ms
Mondelez.png
502 ms
Johnson_and_Johnson_logo-700x130.png
735 ms
Verizon.png
497 ms
Pepsi%20Co.svg
517 ms
Bimbo.png
527 ms
Kraft%20Heinz.png
557 ms
Nestle.png
562 ms
AstraZeneca.png
583 ms
Beiersdorf.png
817 ms
Loreal.png
781 ms
Abbvie.png
609 ms
3041_BuzzbackLogo_Final_2018_CS6.png
624 ms
regular.woff
485 ms
500.woff
516 ms
600.woff
568 ms
700.woff
569 ms
2011339.js
133 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
134 ms
fb.js
101 ms
leadflows.js
110 ms
2011339.js
169 ms
ajax-loader.gif
57 ms
pd.js
15 ms
buzzback.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
buzzback.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
buzzback.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Buzzback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Buzzback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
buzzback.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Buzzback. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: