Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

nepawaste.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

452 ms in total

First Response

188 ms

Resources Loaded

196 ms

Page Rendered

68 ms

nepawaste.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nepawaste content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nepawaste.com

Visit nepawaste.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nepawaste.com page load time and found that the first response time was 188 ms and then it took 264 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nepawaste.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nepawaste.com

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Nepawaste.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (188 ms) belongs to the original domain Nepawaste.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 356.6 kB (63%)

Content Size

568.4 kB

After Optimization

211.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Nepawaste.com main page is 568.4 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 377.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 488 B

  • Original 808 B
  • After minification 757 B
  • After compression 320 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 488 B or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 168 B

  • Original 65.4 kB
  • After minification 65.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nepawaste images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 40.4 kB

  • Original 124.9 kB
  • After minification 124.6 kB
  • After compression 84.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 315.6 kB

  • Original 377.4 kB
  • After minification 377.1 kB
  • After compression 61.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nepawaste.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

nepawaste.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

nepawaste.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

nepawaste.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nepawaste.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nepawaste.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nepawaste. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: