3.3 sec in total
168 ms
1.9 sec
1.2 sec
Visit bytesnap.com now to see the best up-to-date Bytesnap content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bytesnap.com
Award-winning electronic design consultants helping you build better products faster. Expert in embedded software development, hardware design, prototyping, IoT, ATEX, Wireless, BSPs, mobile & desktop...
Visit bytesnap.comWe analyzed Bytesnap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 168 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
bytesnap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
76/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.092
92/100
15%
Value5.0 s
76/100
10%
168 ms
158 ms
396 ms
74 ms
129 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Bytesnap.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (581 ms) belongs to the original domain Bytesnap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 142.6 kB (14%)
1.1 MB
911.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Bytesnap.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 885.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bytesnap images are well optimized though.
We found no issues to fix!
35
35
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bytesnap. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
bytesnap.com
168 ms
www.bytesnap.com
158 ms
www.bytesnap.com
396 ms
Bytesnap_logo_white_250px.png
74 ms
instant_click.min.js
129 ms
Software-Development-ByteSnap-Design-2.jpg
347 ms
overlay.png
226 ms
www.bytesnap.com
301 ms
ByteSnap-Software-Design-and-BSP-Porting_Kernel-Code.jpg
446 ms
Bytesnap-Bespoke-Embedded-Systems-Software-Developers-case-study2-4.jpg
537 ms
Bytesnap-Bespoke-Embedded-Systems-Software-Developers-case-study2-13.jpg
448 ms
SnapUI-ByteSnap.jpg
449 ms
1cocoon_logo-1.webp
74 ms
1automotive-hyundai_250-v2.webp
84 ms
1geotech_logo.webp
86 ms
Embedded-Linux-in-Healthcare-Doctor-using-futuristic-touchscreen-768x430.webp
75 ms
abstract-imx8-vs-imx9-illustration-768x430.webp
84 ms
IoT-Logistics-IoT-solutions-for-Logistics_ByteSnap-768x512.webp
76 ms
Elektra-Winner-email-650.jpg
147 ms
NXP-Gold-Partner_ByteSnap-200x93-1.webp
150 ms
ElektraAwards_Winners_20191-320x202-1.webp
151 ms
arrow-logo-scaled.jpg
167 ms
bizx-with-back-1-e1620230152494-320x202-1.webp
165 ms
ByteSnap-ISO9001-ukas.webp
168 ms
evies-win-ByteSnap-320x202-1.webp
219 ms
Analog-Devices-Allances-bw.png
224 ms
Digi_International_Logo-scaled.jpg
226 ms
BEEAS_10_commended_logo-1a.jpg
248 ms
silabs-logo.png
249 ms
BEAMA-Member-Logo-369x369-1-320x202-1.webp
252 ms
logo_slider_0001_Beea-Winner-320x202-1.webp
290 ms
logo_slider_0003_Microchip-320x202-1.webp
297 ms
logo_slider_0000_Elektra-Winner-320x202-1.webp
300 ms
xmos_logo_rgb_normal.png
331 ms
DigiKey_Electronics_Logo.jpg
581 ms
logo_slider_0002_The-Manufact-Co-Operative-320x202-1.webp
336 ms
logo_slider_0004_arm-320x202-1.webp
363 ms
Bytesnap_logo_white_500px.webp
371 ms
bytesnap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
bytesnap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
bytesnap.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bytesnap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bytesnap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bytesnap.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bytesnap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: