Tools & Wizards About Us
casavidapm.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

casavidapm.com

Property Management - Fairgrove

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

22 ms

Resources Loaded

985 ms

Page Rendered

451 ms

casavidapm.com screenshot

About Website

Visit casavidapm.com now to see the best up-to-date Casavidapm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about casavidapm.com

"Experience peace of mind with our industry-leading property management services tailored for owners and residents in Southern California

Visit casavidapm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Casavidapm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

casavidapm.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,080 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.258

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

casavidapm.com

22 ms

fairgrovepm.com

178 ms

select2.min.css

66 ms

frontend.css

97 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Casavidapm.com, 90% (94 requests) were made to Fairgrovepm.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (396 ms) relates to the external source Fairgrovepm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 330.8 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

734.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Casavidapm.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 370.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 319.3 kB

  • Original 370.5 kB
  • After minification 363.2 kB
  • After compression 51.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 319.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 259.6 kB
  • After minification 259.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Casavidapm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 294.8 kB
  • After minification 294.8 kB
  • After compression 291.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 140.6 kB
  • After minification 140.6 kB
  • After compression 132.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Casavidapm.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (92%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Casavidapm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 44 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

casavidapm.com

casavidapm.com

22 ms

fairgrovepm.com

fairgrovepm.com

178 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

66 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

97 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

96 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

93 ms

eae.min.css

eae.min.css

135 ms

peel.css

peel.css

98 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

98 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

122 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

126 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

129 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

124 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

123 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

149 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

149 ms

global.css

global.css

161 ms

post-724.css

post-724.css

152 ms

post-478.css

post-478.css

155 ms

post-735.css

post-735.css

160 ms

post-151.css

post-151.css

174 ms

post-116.css

post-116.css

175 ms

post-81.css

post-81.css

178 ms

post-62.css

post-62.css

180 ms

style.css

style.css

191 ms

gallery.css

gallery.css

189 ms

style.css

style.css

199 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

200 ms

ecs-style.css

ecs-style.css

204 ms

post-159.css

post-159.css

205 ms

post-160.css

post-160.css

217 ms

post-276.css

post-276.css

218 ms

post-412.css

post-412.css

224 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

233 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

231 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

250 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

247 ms

js

js

87 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

30 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

42 ms

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

jquery-3.6.3.min.js

22 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

41 ms

js

js

125 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

218 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

204 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

176 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

172 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

186 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

185 ms

post-306.css

post-306.css

184 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

162 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

168 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

170 ms

iconHelper.js

iconHelper.js

183 ms

main.js

main.js

180 ms

ecs_ajax_pagination.js

ecs_ajax_pagination.js

172 ms

ecs.js

ecs.js

161 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

245 ms

dropzone.min.js

dropzone.min.js

315 ms

eae.min.js

eae.min.js

241 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

308 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

302 ms

jquery.mask.js

jquery.mask.js

221 ms

elementor-mask.js

elementor-mask.js

292 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

288 ms

main.js

main.js

286 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

331 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

330 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

320 ms

jet-plugins.js

jet-plugins.js

319 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

314 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

313 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

341 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

341 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

334 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

327 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

318 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

310 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

396 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

339 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

339 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

338 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

337 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

325 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

367 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

366 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

366 ms

app.js

app.js

235 ms

hotjar-3856037.js

hotjar-3856037.js

195 ms

P22UndergroundCYDemiBold.woff

P22UndergroundCYDemiBold.woff

143 ms

P22UndergroundCY-Heavy.woff

P22UndergroundCY-Heavy.woff

140 ms

P22UndergroundCYMedium.woff

P22UndergroundCYMedium.woff

166 ms

P22UndergroundCYProBook.woff

P22UndergroundCYProBook.woff

247 ms

P22UndergroundCYProLight.woff

P22UndergroundCYProLight.woff

247 ms

P22UndergroundCYProThin.woff

P22UndergroundCYProThin.woff

246 ms

Frame-427320291.jpg

Frame-427320291.jpg

234 ms

Vector.svg

Vector.svg

129 ms

Frame-427320291-1.jpg

Frame-427320291-1.jpg

235 ms

modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js

modules.a4fd7e5489291affcf56.js

91 ms

PlantinMTProRg.ttf

PlantinMTProRg.ttf

193 ms

PlantinMTProLight.ttf

PlantinMTProLight.ttf

230 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

230 ms

Group-427320288.svg

Group-427320288.svg

107 ms

Logo.svg

Logo.svg

40 ms

Accessibility Review

casavidapm.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

casavidapm.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

casavidapm.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Casavidapm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Casavidapm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

casavidapm.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Casavidapm. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: