Tools & Wizards About Us
cattle.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

cattle.com

Cattle.com

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

cattle.com screenshot

About Website

Visit cattle.com now to see the best up-to-date Cattle content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about cattle.com

Sale results and educational inforamtion from throughout the country.

Visit cattle.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Cattle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

cattle.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,160 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.175

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

cattle.com

100 ms

www.cattle.com

833 ms

MyFontsWebfontsKit.css

80 ms

style.css

82 ms

adsbygoogle.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Cattle.com, 23% (18 requests) were made to Halterbreak.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (833 ms) belongs to the original domain Cattle.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 374.4 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Cattle.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 178.6 kB

  • Original 208.4 kB
  • After minification 200.7 kB
  • After compression 29.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 93.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 961.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Cattle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 96.2 kB

  • Original 227.4 kB
  • After minification 227.4 kB
  • After compression 131.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cattle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (22%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

58

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cattle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

cattle.com

cattle.com

100 ms

www.cattle.com

www.cattle.com

833 ms

MyFontsWebfontsKit.css

MyFontsWebfontsKit.css

80 ms

style.css

style.css

82 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

6 ms

brand

brand

16 ms

brand

brand

59 ms

305b46

305b46

27 ms

Cattle.com;sz=800x120,700x140;ord=4211169742047786

Cattle.com;sz=800x120,700x140;ord=4211169742047786

40 ms

close.png

close.png

196 ms

imgad

imgad

23 ms

moatad.js

moatad.js

24 ms

lidar.js

lidar.js

21 ms

site_logo.jpg

site_logo.jpg

185 ms

10t.jpg

10t.jpg

194 ms

1t.jpg

1t.jpg

187 ms

252673.jpg

252673.jpg

260 ms

29t.jpg

29t.jpg

191 ms

13t.jpg

13t.jpg

184 ms

2t.jpg

2t.jpg

186 ms

50t.jpg

50t.jpg

187 ms

12t.jpg

12t.jpg

186 ms

tag_line.gif

tag_line.gif

181 ms

feed-icon.gif

feed-icon.gif

181 ms

SA_Ring.jpg

SA_Ring.jpg

328 ms

Like.png

Like.png

195 ms

Dislike.png

Dislike.png

187 ms

Americans.png

Americans.png

328 ms

Angus.png

Angus.png

249 ms

Exotic.png

Exotic.png

327 ms

Herefords.png

Herefords.png

270 ms

Shorthorns.png

Shorthorns.png

270 ms

Forth_Worth_Grand_Steer_Prices.PNG

Forth_Worth_Grand_Steer_Prices.PNG

325 ms

Fort_Worth_2016.png

Fort_Worth_2016.png

374 ms

Shorthorn.png

Shorthorn.png

452 ms

PolledHereford.png

PolledHereford.png

373 ms

American.png

American.png

393 ms

Hereford.png

Hereford.png

401 ms

Exotic.png

Exotic.png

452 ms

Angus.png

Angus.png

422 ms

252674.jpg

252674.jpg

250 ms

252672.jpg

252672.jpg

246 ms

252647.jpg

252647.jpg

322 ms

252640.jpg

252640.jpg

321 ms

252631.jpg

252631.jpg

244 ms

252629.jpg

252629.jpg

345 ms

252630.jpg

252630.jpg

320 ms

252580.jpg

252580.jpg

323 ms

252552.jpg

252552.jpg

323 ms

252543.jpg

252543.jpg

367 ms

252541.jpg

252541.jpg

366 ms

252534.jpg

252534.jpg

365 ms

252536.jpg

252536.jpg

365 ms

252530.png

252530.png

367 ms

252537.jpg

252537.jpg

366 ms

252532.jpg

252532.jpg

416 ms

252507.jpg

252507.jpg

396 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

144 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

139 ms

all.js

all.js

130 ms

google_custom_search_watermark.gif

google_custom_search_watermark.gif

159 ms

ca-pub-4885870633001071.js

ca-pub-4885870633001071.js

162 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

176 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

96 ms

305B46_0_0.woff

305B46_0_0.woff

217 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

54 ms

collect

collect

107 ms

222 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

108 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

131 ms

ads

ads

293 ms

osd.js

osd.js

43 ms

collect

collect

77 ms

305B46_0_0.ttf

305B46_0_0.ttf

75 ms

8749682401125418371

8749682401125418371

39 ms

abg.js

abg.js

45 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

63 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

94 ms

s

s

4 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

5 ms

Accessibility Review

cattle.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

cattle.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

cattle.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Cattle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Cattle.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

cattle.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Cattle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: